| Welcome
To Kurt's Controversy Central Section |
The Gene Pool And Sexual Survival
By Kurt Saxon
A deer herd is led by the ablest buck. He takes all the does and fights
any challenging bachelor. Bachelors may never breed, but they stay, giving alarms and
fighting off predators while the does feed in the guarded area. They are still in the gene
pool. When the leader weakens or is killed, the best bachelor takes over.
The ablest wolf in a pack is usually the only breeder. Pack bachelors hunt and guard the
leader, his mate and pups. Females born to the pack leave with the strongest bachelors and
begin their own packs.
Sex among wild animals is only a driving urge to survive genetically. The male is not
turned on unless there is a nearby female in heat. The urge being seasonal, the animals
are peaceful for long periods between mating. Humans are not regulated by seasons so they
are ready just about all the time.
Primitive groups of men were regulated basically the same as the deer herd or the wolf
pack. The best man had all or most of the women to himself. But since the procreative urge
was fairly constant among both sexes, there had to be rules, lest constant infighting
destroy the group. Humans had to ritualize, traditionalize and rationalize sex.
The Bible is the most explicit record we have of primitive people; nomadic herdsmen and
small village groups. Here is graphic evidence that primitive peoples replaced the
animals' natural sexual restraints with the taboo.
These taboos were just as strong with primitives as biological regulation was with
animals. The human bachelor, too, had to wait his turn for an available female. He could
only find gratification through winning a female in battle or buying her from his chief.
When Jacob considered himself worthy to reproduce, he went to his third cousin, Laban and
asked for pretty Rachel. The price was seven years of servitude. Then Laban gave him his
older daughter, Leah, instead of Rachel, Genesis 29:21-26, saying he wanted to get rid of
his firstborn first. Laban got Jacob to work still another seven years for Rachel.
As hard on Jacob as that was, it shows that he accepted the rigid sexual taboos of his
culture. Like the animal bachelor, Jacob was resigned to celibacy until his mating was
approved. As most men in his culture, he had to struggle to pass on his genes.
As agriculture developed and more people could survive with less effort, cities came into
being. Here, there were not the controls faced by deer, wolves, and simple herdsmen like
Jacob.
The city fathers had the best and the most females. Males without property or influence
took the leavings for wives or had access to prostitutes. Prostitution may have been
encouraged by the leaders to keep bachelors away from their harems. Homosexuality may also
have become tolerated for the same reason.
Thus, the leaders controlled the gene pool, so did not feel threatened by the vices of
common folk. At any rate, with the institution of cities, sex became associated with
pleasure.
Sex was not fun to Jacob; it was just a relief of his natural urge. To his wives and
concubines, it was only for the conception of children, a primitive woman's only chance
for fulfillment and recognition.
The fact that Jacob did not even know he was mating with Leah instead of Rachel, Gen.
29:25, shows that the act was as simple and one-sided as the sex act can be. This is
reinforced by the tale of Judah and his daughter-in-law, Tamar. (Gen. all of chapter 38)
After the Lord killed two of her husbands, Tamar despaired of being got with child. She
then played the prostitute and seduced Judah on his way to shear sheep.
Now, Tamar was around the house constantly, but Judah did not recognize her when he mated
with her. No kissing or foreplay. Just wham-bam-thank-you-maam. That was sex among
primitives.
On the woman's part, there was no involvement. She was just a vessel; an incubator. In
Deuteronomy 25:11, the law states that if a woman touches a man's "secrets",
even in defense of her husband's life, her hand was to be cut off. This taboo concerning
the male organs was just a reinforcement of a woman's non-involvement in the sex act.
Non-involvement for the female was essential since the husband was often away. Had she
considered sex itself as pleasure, she might have been attracted to other men. So sex
among primitives was only for relief and procreation. Only in the cities had sex become a
way of life, rather than simply a part, and therefore a vice.
In primitive, close-knit societies, violations of sexual taboos had consequences
understood by all. If a man's son took up with prostitutes or other men, his father was
denied grandchildren. If a bachelor deer should choose the best young buck for a mate,
when the lead buck was out, who would fight for the does? A lesser qualified buck would
pass on the genes while the prancing bucks fed with the girls. End of herd. If a bachelor
wolf frisked with the next in line for succession as pack leader, on the death of the
leader a lesser qualified bachelor would take over and the pack would die out. In Jacob's
group, life was so hard and infant mortality was so high that no one could be spared from
contributing to the gene pool. Had he took up with a fellow herdsman, he would not have
worked fourteen years to get Rachel and then the Christmas card business would never have
had a chance.
As primitives became less primitive and more children lived, it became easy for them to
lose sight of the importance of the gene pool. So elders set about codifying the sexual
taboos into law. But since sex is usually done in private, the laws would have been hard
to enforce. The best method known to them of enforcing genetically proper sexual behavior
was to say that the laws were given and enforced by the local deity. This worked, after a
fashion, but as people merged and traded gods back and forth, the sex laws became
adulterated and generally they lost sight of their real purpose. This was especially so in
the cities.
Enforcement of the sex laws was in a large part responsible for the Israelites' antagonism
to city folk, their loose ways and their many gods. They feared any influence by
foreigners and their often more sexually liberal gods.
Today's people seem ignorant of the natural laws concerning their gene pool. This is
especially so in this country, where homosexuality is promoted as a purely private matter
and an individual right.
Opposing this growing attitude is Anita Bryant and her Save Our Children campaign. I
admire her stand and that of all her supporters. But her main emphasis seems to be on
religion. Primitives have almost universally been anti-homosexual, regardless of what gods
they worshipped. To ascribe a purely genetic law to a specific god obscures the purpose of
the law.
Anita says that since homosexuals cannot reproduce, they must recruit. This is her most
valid point and conforms to the law governing the gene pool. Since recruitment is epidemic
in our time, this point should be elaborated on almost to the exclusion of other
arguments. But in quoting scripture so often she makes homosexuality a Fundamentalist
Christian issue. People who are not Fundamentalist Christians and have no concept of the
gene pool, simply consider anti-homosexuality to be religious bigotry.
That this is not at all the case is proven by the attitude toward homosexuality by Russia
and Red China, communists and therefore atheists. In Russia, homosexuals are sent away,
seldom to be heard of again. In China, homosexual seduction is punishable by death, as it
should be here.
As a Survivalist, you may consider our culture too far gone to be concerned with a bunch
of perverts taking themselves out of the gene pool. You may believe they are natural
defectives and so the species would be better off without their genes. Also, with so many
more people than the nation can properly handle, the less children born, the better.
The truth is, however, that homosexuals are not necessarily natural defectives. And
concerning the surplus population, to call robbing the gene pool "birth control"
is insane.
If homosexuals preyed only on inferiors there would be some positive results. But whereas
the normal male wants the prettiest, healthiest girl, the homosexual is attracted to the
best looking, healthiest boys around him or girls around her.
Psychologists have found no evidence that any virgin is naturally oriented toward
homosexuality. There is no such thing as a born homosexual. Homosexuality is a learned
preference. Also learned are the effeminate mannerisms and speech patterns.
Homosexual seduction usually occurs when a young person has passed puberty but as yet has
had no real sexual experience with another. He is often lonely, confused and alienated. He
is then befriended by a homosexual and seduced. Since it is his only sexual experience and
part of a friendly relationship, it can become his preference, and then he is out of the
gene pool.
Not all youngsters are approached. Not all attempted seductions are consummated. Often, a
lad is approached by a stranger and given a particularly disgusting proposition or is
offended by unwelcome physical contact. In his ignorance he believes there was something
about him that told the pervert he would be receptive. Doubting himself from then on and
wanting to remove any such doubts from the minds of others, he becomes a "queer
baiter". The queer baiter often contributes to homosexuality. Not content to insult
obvious homosexuals, he will taunt a virgin lad with "fairy", "sissy",
etc., because the boy may be gentler and quieter than other boys. If the taunting gets to
the boy and makes him doubt himself, he may be a pushover for the first homosexual he
meets. A father who nags his son to go out for sports and be a "man", often
drives the kid right into the arms of the coach.
Homosexuality is indeed epidemic in our land. Los Angeles alone is reputed to have at
least 30,000 or more little boy prostitutes, some preteeners. Homosexuals say they are not
interested in little boys. They would have you believe the real culprits are child
molesters--pedophiles.
These wretched pedophiles sometimes kill their victims and most often injure them
physically and/or mentally. The victim of the child molester is usually traumatized and so
is hardly likely to seek more of the same treatment.
No, the 30,000 little boy prostitutes in Los Angeles and elsewhere were seduced by
predatory homosexuals who treated them gently and paid them. And 30,000 little boy
prostitutes could not get by in the trade without a large clientele of active homosexuals
who do indeed like little boys. There are at least 200,000 homosexuals in Los Angeles
County and over 100,000 in San Francisco. Homosexuality is addictive and since it is
spreading like a plague, you might even say it is contagious.
With the new tolerance toward this vice, every child is more vulnerable now. Especially
when he sees perverts parading across the TV screen to the cheers of Liberal
"heterosexuals".
One such Liberal is Jim Dunbar, a San Francisco talk show host. A while back, I heard him
say he was encouraging his fifteen-year-old son to be tolerant of homosexuals. I was glad
to hear him say that. Anyone who has done as much as Jim Dunbar to spread the acceptance
of perversion deserves to have his line die out.
There is little you can do about the national gene pool. But you must guard your own
family gene pool. You should tell your youngsters that if any adult gets overly friendly
and tries to pet or fondle them, they should come home and tell you. Now with homosexuals
agitating to teach as identifiable perverts, our national gene pool is in even more
danger. If I had a kid whose teacher was an admitted homosexual, I would see that teacher
on the road or under the ground.
|
